U.S. Supreme Court Okay's New York Trial Judge Selection

The U.S. Supreme Court has okay'd New York's system to select trial judges in New York in Board of Elections v. Torres.  In New York, primary voters elect convention delegates who choose candidates for the judgeships. Once they are nominated, those candidates run on the general election ballot. In practice, they frequently have no opposition. 

supreme court judge law new york trial judge selection jugeCritics have been complaining that the conventions are patronage-driven affairs in which allies of party leaders are rewarded with judgeships and all others are shut out. Justice Scalia reversed two federal courts saying that the system's opponents ''complain not of the state law, but of the voters' (and their elected delegates') preference for the choices of the party leadership."

In Canada, we're used to elected officials choosing our judges.

What do you think is better?


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.